In the latest developments of the SEC/COINBASE lawsuit, Hogan & Deaton have filed a motion to dismiss. They argue that the lawsuit lacks merit and should be thrown out. This article explores the key arguments made by Hogan & Deaton in their motion and provides an overview of the ongoing legal battle between the SEC and COINBASE.
SIGN UP FOR A FREE 7 DAY TRIALGET YOUR .CRYPTO DOMAIN AT UNSTOPPABLE DOMAINS
TRADE CRYPTO ON BINANCE HERE "LOW FEES"
Introduction
In the ever-evolving world of cryptocurrencies, legal battles and regulatory compliance form an integral part of the industry’s growth. One such legal dispute gaining significant attention is the lawsuit between the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Coinbase, a leading cryptocurrency exchange. As this legal tussle unfolds, attorneys Jeremy Hogan and John Deaton have been closely monitoring and analyzing the latest developments. In this article, we delve into the recent updates surrounding the SEC/COINBASE lawsuit, as per the insights shared by Hogan and Deaton.
Coinbase’s Defense Strategy: Ripple’s Legal Arguments in Play
Coinbase, in its bid to fend off the SEC lawsuit, has chosen an interesting defense strategy. According to recent reports, Coinbase is using Ripple’s legal arguments in its defense against the SEC. This move has garnered attention within the cryptocurrency community, as the Ripple case has significant implications for the entire industry. By leveraging Ripple’s legal framework, Coinbase aims to challenge the SEC’s allegations and seek dismissal of the lawsuit.
Coinbase’s Decision to Keep XRP on its Exchange
One particularly noteworthy point in Coinbase’s defense is its decision to keep XRP listed on its exchange, despite other platforms delisting the cryptocurrency. When XRP faced delisting due to the SEC’s classification of it as an unregistered security, Coinbase took a different stance. Coinbase continued to allow the trading of XRP on its platform, making it a key element in their forthcoming legal battle against the SEC.
Coinbase’s Extensive Response: A 177-Page Rebuttal
To counter the SEC’s allegations, Coinbase submitted a comprehensive response. This response, spanning an astonishing 177 pages, highlights the exchange’s commitment to defending itself vigorously. The sheer length of the filing indicates the level of detail and thoroughness with which Coinbase intends to present its case. Lawyers and industry insiders alike are eagerly poring over the document to gauge Coinbase’s legal stance and arguments against the SEC’s claims.
Coinbase’s Reference to the Ripple Case
Within the 177-page response, Coinbase refers to the Ripple case on multiple occasions. Attorney Jeremy Hogan, who has been providing insights on the case, notes that this reference to the Ripple case is significant. It suggests that Coinbase aims to capitalize on any progress or precedents set in the Ripple case to bolster its own defense. By aligning its arguments with those made by Ripple, Coinbase aims to strengthen its position in the lawsuit.
The Major Questions Doctrine: Insights from Attorney John Deaton
Attorney John Deaton has contributed valuable analysis to the ongoing Coinbase/SEC lawsuit. Deaton offers his expertise on the Major Questions Doctrine, an important legal principle that could shape the outcome of the case. According to Deaton, the Major Questions Doctrine requires clarity from Congress when it comes to determining whether a cryptocurrency is a security or not. This doctrine plays a critical role in determining the applicability of securities laws to digital assets.
Suspension of Secondary Market Trading for XRP on Coinbase
While the lawsuit ensues, Coinbase has taken the precautionary step of halting secondary market trading of XRP on its exchange. This suspension aligns with Coinbase’s defense strategy, allowing them to maintain consistency and reinforce their arguments. By voluntarily suspending the trading of XRP, Coinbase aims to demonstrate its commitment to cooperating with the SEC while simultaneously protecting its interests.
Coinbase’s Argument: Howey Test and Tokens
One of the key arguments in Coinbase’s defense is that secondary market trading of any token, except for XRP, does not meet the Howey test. The Howey test is a legal criterion used to determine whether an instrument qualifies as a security. By leveraging this argument, Coinbase seeks to refute the SEC’s claims that it facilitated the sale of unregistered securities. Coinbase aims to establish that their token listing practices comply with the relevant legal standards.
Conclusion
As the SEC/COINBASE lawsuit progresses, the involvement of prominent attorneys Jeremy Hogan and John Deaton brings valuable insights and analysis to the table. Coinbase’s defense strategy, influenced by the Ripple case, introduces novel angles to the legal landscape. The extensive response filed by Coinbase, along with its references to the Ripple case, paints a clear picture of the exchange’s determination to contest the SEC’s allegations. Furthermore, the suspension of XRP trading and the invocation of the Major Questions Doctrine add layers of complexity to this high-stakes legal battle.
FAQs After The Conclusion:
- What is the SEC/COINBASE lawsuit about?
- How is Coinbase using Ripple’s legal arguments in its defense?
- Why did Coinbase choose to keep XRP listed on its exchange?
- How long is Coinbase’s response to the SEC lawsuit?
- What significance does the Major Questions Doctrine hold in the SEC/COINBASE lawsuit?
